Hi, this is my first blog about writing historical fiction.
I love the genre. As a kid I devoured every Hornblower book I could get from
the library. Now, I’m a big fan of Patrick O’Brian, Bernard Cornwell, Caleb
Carr and Jeff Shaara; the list is endless!
I’ve written two of my own historical fiction novels (A Terrible Unrest and The Village), and I guess the biggest
challenge I’ve encountered – like everybody – is where to draw the line between
historical fact and fiction. Sure, I can’t make blatant mistakes(too much) like
changing dates or locations, although in both of my novels I’ve telescoped
certain events and invented specific locations to help the story’s trajectory.
I check all my facts very carefully, but would a reader really care if,
for example, the novel included, say, a plant or animal that wasn’t native at
the time? Even the great Bernard Cornwell once wrote that you’re going to get
some things wrong and you will always have a reader more than willing to let
I fall back ultimately on the fact that I’m not writing a
historical tome. The primary goal of my novels is to entertain the reader and
hope that any inaccuracies aren’t too egregious.
I would love to hear from you. So, please, give me your
thoughts and let’s get a conversation going. Thanks.